 |
Too many terrible cultural norms to ignore. |
Part of the Sunday
School lesson this past week was about how Elijah restored the sealing power to the
earth. I couldn't find that in the scriptures- can you? (I found a bunch
of scriptures about Elijah turning hearts and binding stuff, though.)

After a few minutes of research into the Hebrew origins of the words, I
came to the conclusion that bind and seal are two very different
things. And I was careless enough to voice my findings in class. Bad id
ea.
Apparently, Sunday School does not tolerate disagreement. A young,
well-meaning woman told me that, in the bible Dictionary, the meanings
are the same. I said, "There's a lot of inaccuracies in the Bible
Dictionary." She says that the Bible Dictionary is true; it was written
by the prophet. I said, "No it wasn't". Her young, well-meaning husband
steps in and says that the Bible Dictionary is part of the Standard
works and, as such, considered scripture. I said, "No, its not". He told
me that saying that the Bible Dictionary isn't scripture is apostasy.
 |
Their ignorance is adorable |
Oddly enough, I feel proud of myself for being called an apostate by
this blissfully ignorant, young, well-meaning couple.
Just another day in my life.
 |
Robert Matthews: look him up |
|
By the way, Robert Matthews is largely responsible for the LDS version of the Bible Dictionary, not
Thomas S. Monson. Not even the
Bible Dictionary itself claims to be scripture: "This dictionary is
provided to help your study of the scriptures and is not intended as an
official statement of Church doctrine or an endorsement of the
historical and cultural views set forth."
Just sayin...
Good job! I'm proud of you for standing up for that. I'll go along with Ensigns being scripture, but nope. Not the Bible Dictionary. Does this mean they think the index is scripture also? lol...good job for you.
ReplyDeleteI'm almost positive they think that anything contained in the quad is scripture, pictures and all.
Delete